It is with that background that I have to comment on the some pretty sensational articles I have read in in the media about everything from norovirus to safety onboard ships to cruises that have some legitimate concerns.
The most recent one involves an incident on a Disney Cruise earlier this month concerning a 4 month old infant that was involuntarily disembarked mid-cruise in the Bahamas.
As I read the various reports there are only a few facts which seem to be consistent across the articles; which can be the result of errors in the media's reporting, conflicting stories from various sources (the mother, father, ship staff, hospital staff, attorneys, some unidentified guy who said he saw or heard something, etc.).
- The 4 month old infant's parents booked the cruise before Disney Cruises announced the change in age policy from 12 weeks to 6 months as of January 1st.
- Disney's new policy was not to apply to those infants booked prior to the announced change.
- The infant was reported ill very shortly after the cruise commenced.
- The infant was taken to the ship's infirmary
- The infant was given some sort of medicine
- The parents were advised they would be involuntarily disembarked when the ship reached the Bahamas.
The first reported version of the story was that the involuntary disembarkation was due to the change in age policy. The first thing that popped into my mind was - considering you have to register before you board the ship - how was this not "red flagged" and embarkation denied. The second thing that popped into my head is that no cruise line is going to involuntarily disembark a guest without checking with the main office as it is a rather big deal.
The second version of the story was that the involuntary disembarkation was because the ship's doctor felt the infant should see a pediatric specialist sooner than later. This also was quite curious as it would seem counter-intuitive to dump a guest with an allegedly sick infant in the Bahamas (a port where warnings are given to passengers as to it being unsafe) with an assumption that better medical care would urgently be provided in some unknown facility on this island.
Then the third version came out today that the ship's doctor alleged gave the infant a particular medicine in an unmarked container that warns against giving it to any child under 2, that the child became sleepy (a known side effect) and slept for few hours, but then a second doctor asked them to return to the infirmary where they were asked to disembark.
Disney Cruise Line's comment, by the way, is reportedly, “Disney Cruise Line contracts with a third-party medical provider, and the recommendation to have the patient leave the ship and obtain medical care at a hospital was based solely on the professional opinion of the onboard doctor who evaluated the patient’s symptoms and medical needs,” Rena Langley, Vice President of Public Affairs for Disney Cruise Line, said in the statement."
So now I am thinking:
- Was the infant sick before cruise?
- What illness did the infant have?
- What symptoms did the infant have? (Dehydration, for example, can be critical in an infant.)
- Why was the first story that they were involuntarily disembarked because of an age policy violation when, as Disney's statements makes clear, the decision was not about that at all?
- What does, and how did, the story of some alleged medicine in an allegedly unmarked container (thought the parents apparently knew what it was) come to be and why is it relevant?
And then I read the last line of the most recent article what ends, "has been contacted by attorneys who specialize in cruise ship cases." KAAL TV Article
Note, it does not say "The parents have contacted an attorney." It says an attorney who specialized in cruise ship cases contacted them...also known as "ambulance chasing". And that got me wondering who is the source of the information and why was that last line says "specializing in cruise ship cases".
This apparently is not the first time in the past month that firm has sought to stir up ridiculous claims - having jumped on the Oceania situation as I wrote on December 15th. Oceania Insignia - A Fire, Three Lives Lost, Quick Action By Oceania...and An Ambulance Chaser. The firm even has an app so that you can contact them while you are on your cruise.
To be fair, there are bad things that happen. They happen when you are in your home (home invasions, fires, burglaries, domestic violence, etc.). They happen in hotels (norovirus, invasions, fires, thefts, etc.). They happen at amusement parks (rapes, food poisoning, thefts, assaults, etc.). They happen in restaurants (food poisonings, theft of expensive coats, etc.) In fact, they happen everywhere from shopping malls to ski slopes.
And there are times when lawyers are needed to represent people that have been injured or who have been wronged or who want/need to avoid problems and issues.
But the media must be more responsible. The New York Times motto since 1896 has been "All the News That's Fit to Print". It is time for the media to consider if the "news" is fit to print.
The media's recent fixation with the cruise industry has resulted in a philosophy of "If it Fits its News"...not even the previous bastardization of "All the News that Fits".